
US Extreme Weather and Climate Change Dashboard
Methodology
This entire site is possible because of publicly available data, funded by taxpayers and governments around the world. Open science is good science.
Methodology & Sources — full PDFData provenance, detection framework, reliable-trend windows, and known limitations for every variable, in one document.Detection and Attribution
This dashboard focuses only on detection, following the IPCC's framework for detecting a change in climate. The IPCC's definitions are below (Glossary, AR5/AR6/SR15, "Detection and Attribution"), and this site applies them throughout.
- Climate: "The average weather, or more rigorously, the statistical description in terms of the mean and variability of relevant quantities over a period of time ranging from months to thousands or millions of years."
- Climate change: "A change in the state of the climate that can be identified (e.g., by using statistical tests) by changes in the mean and/or the variability of its properties, and that persists for an extended period, typically decades or longer."
- Detection: "The process of demonstrating that climate or a system affected by climate has changed in some defined statistical sense, without providing a reason for that change. An identified change is detected in observations if its likelihood of occurrence by chance due to internal variability alone is determined to be small, for example, <10%."
- Attribution: "The process of evaluating the relative contributions of multiple causal factors to a change or event with a formal assessment of confidence."
Detection and attribution are two distinct steps, and this dashboard performs only the first. Detection asks whether observations have changed in a defined statistical sense, without saying why. Attribution asks why — evaluating the relative contribution of specific causal factors (greenhouse gas forcing, land-use change, natural variability, and so on) typically requires climate model simulations run with and without a given forcing, a substantially larger undertaking, and outside this project's scope. No panel on this site states an attribution finding. A panel marked "Detected Change" says two things about the observed trend: chance internal variability alone would rarely produce it, and it runs large against that variability. It says nothing about a cause, human or otherwise.
Detecting a change is also not the same as spotting a trend in a chart. Any naturally variable quantity drifts up and down over any finite stretch purely from year-to-year (or week-to-week) variability, with no underlying change in the climate at all — a trend line by itself proves nothing. IPCC's detection criterion asks whether that trend is unlikely to have arisen from natural internal variability by chance alone, specifically at the stated example threshold of below 10% (via the nonparametric Mann-Kendall test used throughout this site). This dashboard goes one step beyond IPCC's minimum: because a long, low-noise record can register a statistically real trend even when its actual size is trivial next to the variable's natural variability, a trend earns the detected change label here only if it also clears a second, magnitude-based bar — see the "Magnitude-vs-variability check" definition. A trend can clear IPCC's likelihood criterion and still not count as a detected change on this site for that reason.
Detection and time of emergence
Detection asks whether a change has already appeared in the observational record. Time of emergence asks when a signal rises above the noise around it, and the literature answers that in several different ways: AR6 WG1 Chapter 12 names two definitions in its opening sentence on the subject and adopts a signal-to-noise convention only where a study does not specify otherwise. A third approach asks how many years a record must run before a projected signal could show up at all. TheDetection and Time of Emergence page sets out the three, reproduces AR6's Table 12.12, and runs the third calculation on both TXx series tracked here.
Charts on this site already show a years-to-detection figure (Weatherhead et al. 1998) where a variable renders no detected change, and that figure takes its trend magnitude from the record under test, which makes it post-hoc. Read it as a description of what the record could resolve. The emergence timescale on the page above takes its trend magnitude from AR6 instead, which is what lets it say something the p-value does not.
Sources
- Heat waves: reconstructed directly from NOAA's GHCN-Daily station records (the ~1,218-station HCN reference network), since NOAA's named source for this variable — the Accumulated Heat Wave Index — turned out to be a frozen, one-off analysis that stopped updating in 2021 rather than the live product it appeared to be. A per-station 90th-percentile trailing-4-day-mean threshold stands in for Kunkel et al.'s original (not fully public) method.
- Tornadoes & hail: NCEI's Storm Events Database, live and continuously updated. Storm Events records one row per county a tornado's path crosses rather than one row per tornado — the pipeline reconstructs physical tornado tracks from those segments before counting (see Known Caveats).
- Streamflow: USGS's HCDN-2009/GAGES-II reference-gauge network (741 gauges, minimally altered by dams/diversions/urbanization), queried live against USGS's National Water Information System.
- Drought: the US Drought Monitor's weekly categorical area percentages (2000–present) as the headline series, with NOAA nClimDiv's national Palmer Drought Severity Index (1895–present) as a long-record context layer. Three further drought types appear alongside it, each measuring a different deficit: SPEI (rainfall minus evaporative demand, computed here from GHCN-Daily, 1895–present), NOAA CPC Monthly Soil Moisture v2 (agricultural drought, 1948–present), and the low tail of the same USGS reference-gauge network the streamflow page uses (hydrologic drought, 1957–present).
- Winter storms: NCEI's Regional Snowfall Index storm catalog, accessed via its live ArcGIS REST service (its landing page has no working download link — the actual live data lives one layer down).
- Wildfire: MTBS (Monitoring Trends in Burned Severity, satellite-measured burned area, 1984–present) and NIFC (National Interagency Fire Center, fire count, 1983–present) — two independent products with different methodologies, shown as separate panels rather than merged into one series.
- US landfalling hurricanes: NHC's HURDAT2 Atlantic best-track archive, downloaded and parsed directly. The pipeline detects landfalls from each storm's fix coordinates against a real US country boundary rather than from any single source's landfall flag (HURDAT2's flag has real, documented gaps — see Known Caveats).
Data Sources — Attribution & Licensing
Every dataset behind this site is publicly available, and most are US government works with no copyright restriction (17 U.S.C. §105). A few come from non-US or university-hosted producers with their stated citation or attribution convention — this page quotes those verbatim below rather than paraphrasing them.
- NOAA NCEI GHCN-Daily, nClimGrid-Daily & nClimDiv (CIRS climdiv): Producer: NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. License: US Government work, public domain. Used for heat waves (raw-station and homogenized-gridded panels), cold extremes, and drought's long-record PDSI context layer.
- NOAA NCEI Storm Events Database: Producer: NOAA NCEI. License: US Government work, public domain. Used for tornadoes and hail.
- NOAA NCEI Regional Snowfall Index (RSI): Producer: NOAA NCEI. License: US Government work, public domain. Methodology citation: Squires, M.F., Lawrimore, J.H., Heim, R.R., Robinson, D.A., Gerbush, M.R., and Estilow, T.W. (2014): "The Regional Snowfall Index," Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 95(12), 1835–1848. Used for winter storms.
- NHC HURDAT2 & NWS/WPC tropical rainfall records: Producer: NOAA National Hurricane Center / Weather Prediction Center. License: US Government work, public domain. Used for US landfalling hurricanes and hurricane rainfall.
- NOAA GOES-19 GeoColor imagery (NESDIS/STAR): Producer: NOAA National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service. License: US Government work, public domain. Used for the homepage CONUS satellite hero image.
- USGS HCDN-2009/GAGES-II & National Water Information System: Producer: US Geological Survey. License: US Government work, public domain. Used for streamflow.
- MTBS (Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity): Producer: joint USGS / USDA Forest Service program. License: US Government work, public domain. Used for wildfire burned area.
- NIFC (National Interagency Fire Center): Producer: multi-agency US federal wildland fire coordination center. License: US Government work, public domain. Used for wildfire count.
- US Drought Monitor (USDM): Producer: National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC), University of Nebraska–Lincoln, jointly with USDA, NOAA, and NASA — a university-hosted joint product rather than a pure US-government public-domain dataset. Required attribution (per droughtmonitor.unl.edu's permission page): "The U.S. Drought Monitor is jointly produced by the National Drought Mitigation Center at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, the United States Department of Agriculture, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Map courtesy of NDMC." Used for drought's headline series.
- NOAA CPC Monthly Soil Moisture v2: Producer: NOAA Climate Prediction Center, distributed by NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory. License: US Government work, public domain; PSL requests acknowledgement. Requested attribution: "CPC Soil Moisture data provided by the NOAA PSL, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their website at https://psl.noaa.gov". Method citation: Fan, Y. and H. van den Dool (2004), "Climate Prediction Center global monthly soil moisture data set at 0.5° resolution for 1948 to present", Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 109, D10102, doi:10.1029/2003JD004345. Used for the agricultural (soil-moisture) drought series.
- ERA5 (via ARCO-ERA5, Google Cloud's public analysis-ready mirror): Producer: Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) / ECMWF. License: Copernicus license — free and open, attribution required. Required attribution: "Generated using Copernicus Climate Change Service information [Year]" (or "Contains modified Copernicus Climate Change Service information [Year]" where the data has been processed). Used for the CONUS convective-instability (CAPE) index.
- gridMET: Producer: University of Idaho Climatology Lab. License: freely available academic dataset; citation requested rather than a restrictive license. Requested citation: Abatzoglou, J.T. (2013): "Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling," International Journal of Climatology 33(1), 121–131. Used for the fire-weather (vapor pressure deficit) index.
- Extratropical-cyclone (ETC) track data: Producer: NERC EDS Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA), UK. License: UK Open Government Licence (equivalent to CC BY), attribution required. Required citation: Gray, S.L.; Volonte, A.; Martinez-Alvarado, O.; Harvey, B. (2024): "A global climatology of sting-jet cyclones: TRACK files and Sting-Jet Precursor Cut-Outs." NERC EDS Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA). doi: 10.5285/4aac4f8ba15f43e59eb81756b464c9fb. Used for ETC intensity (bomb-cyclone frequency, minimum pressure, peak wind).
- Natural Earth: Producer: Natural Earth (Tom Patterson, Nathaniel Vaughn Kelso, and contributors). License: public domain — no permission or attribution required, though the producers welcome an optional one. Used for map boundary geometry.
Definitions
- Reliable-trend window: every variable has a longer raw record than the window over which its trend is meaningfully comparable year to year — instrumentation and methodology changes (Doppler radar deployment, satellite-based measurement, reference-network construction) mean the earliest years often aren't measuring the same thing as recent ones. Each panel defaults to a documented window that the window-start/window-end controls can widen or narrow.
- Mann-Kendall test & Sen's slope: the trend statistics used throughout — nonparametric methods that don't assume normally-distributed data (several of these series show bounds, skew, or a mass of zeros), standard in the climate-trend literature for exactly this kind of question. Reported alongside a two-sided p-value; a trend earns the "statistically significant" label only at p < 0.10 (see "Detected Change" below).
- "Detected Change": this site's combined standard, applied throughout — see "Detection and Attribution" above for the underlying IPCC definitions. A trend counts as a detected change only if it clears both: (1) IPCC's likelihood criterion, treating the Mann-Kendall p-value as that likelihood (p < 0.10, per IPCC's "for example, <10%" language — deliberately looser than the common p < 0.05 convention, because that's the threshold IPCC's language actually specifies), and (2) the magnitude check below — since a likelihood pass alone says nothing about the size of the change. A trend that clears only the likelihood criterion reads as statistically real under a "No Detected Change" label rather than a qualified "detected."
- Magnitude-vs-variability check: IPCC's glossary text is a likelihood definition and doesn't itself specify a magnitude threshold, so this third check is this project's disclosed judgment call rather than an IPCC-mandated number. Computed as the trend's total fitted change (Sen's slope × window length) as a share of the variable's 90% ("very likely") historical range -- the same band shown as shading on each chart. A trend needs at least 25% of that range to count toward a detected change — found directly in this site's data as the reason a statistically real trend can still read "No Detected Change": streamflow's trend is statistically real (p=0.011) but only ~4% of its 90% historical range, vs. wildfire's MTBS area-burned trend (also statistically real, p < 0.001) at ~63% of its range.
- 66% / 90% shading: IPCC's calibrated-language convention ("likely" / "very likely") applied to each variable's historical distribution within the selected window — the 17th–83rd and 5th–95th percentile range of observed values, shown as a reference envelope for how much this variable normally varies rather than a forecast interval.
- Saffir-Simpson category / F-EF scale: hurricanes and tornadoes are both binned by NHC's and NWS's standard severity scales respectively, assigned from the recorded wind at the specific event (landfall fix for hurricanes, damage survey for tornadoes) rather than a storm's peak intensity at any other point in its life.
Known caveats
- Every finding on this site is CONUS-specific rather than a global claim. This dashboard's whole scope is US weather and climate data — no panel here says anything about global trends, and a US pattern (a record year, a detected change, a "Dataset Dependent" disagreement) can and often does point opposite to the global picture over the same period. The 1930s Dust Bowl is the clearest example: it's a real, well-documented CONUS-scale heat extreme visible in this site's heat-wave data, but global temperatures over the same years were cooler than today — treat any US-only finding here as exactly that rather than evidence about the planet as a whole.
- Heat waves' headline detection metric is WSDI computed on NOAA's homogenized, gridded nClimGrid-Daily product, deliberately chosen over this site's raw per-station panels (heat wave index, TXx, WSDI, TN90p — all an unweighted mean across raw, non-homogenized GHCN-Daily stations, with no correction for instrument changes, station moves, or time-of-observation shifts, and no adjustment for uneven station density) because trend detection specifically calls for homogenized data, and because it's the same standard as the IPCC/NCA literature. That raw-station combination is exactly the kind of pitfall that has produced misleading "hotter in the 1930s" claims elsewhere — this site's raw per-station WSDI shows a small, real decline since 1895 (not a detected change once weighed against variability), a different picture from the homogenized headline panel's clear detected increase since 1951. This page shows both side by side rather than merging them into one number; an independent, peer-reviewed analysis using similarly raw, unadjusted station data reaches a comparable raw-data conclusion (Christy 2026). Where this site's metrics disagree with each other, the summary tables say "Dataset Dependent" instead of implying consensus.
- Hail has no reliable-trend window at any point in its record — report counts track population density, spotter-network growth, and reporting practice far more than any real climate signal, a limitation NCA5 (2023) states explicitly. Shown with a permanent, prominent caveat rather than a trend line.
- Streamflow and USDM drought's windows are download-boundary artifacts rather than discovered data-quality boundaries — unlike heat waves' empirically-found 1895 cutoff, these two variables' start years (1990 and 2000 respectively) are simply how far back each pipeline's live feed reaches, so the reliable window spans their whole downloaded record.
- Winter storms uses Category 3+ (major) counts rather than the raw storm count — the raw count likely conflates a real climate signal with growth in the observing network over the last century.
- Wildfire's two panels (MTBS area burned, NIFC fire count) measure different things on different timelines, so do not read them as a single series — MTBS's latest year typically lags NIFC's by 1–2 years, and NIFC's live data doesn't extend before 1983 at all (contradicting some older published tables that imply a longer record).
- Hurricane landfall counts use a simplified continental-US geometry test (a single buffered country polygon plus a bounding box rather than a full coastline/land-mask reconstruction), and a storm that weakens below hurricane intensity before actually reaching the coast drops out correctly even if popular memory keeps it as a hurricane (e.g. Fern, 1971). See the Methodology & Sources PDF for the full validation against the known Category-5 landfall list.
- A side-by-side comparison of how IPCC AR6 has characterized each hazard, and how it compares to this site's detected-change findings, lives on the Detection & Attribution page. A fuller three-assessment comparison (adding NCA4/CSSR 2018 and NCA5 2023) remains a possible future expansion.

